Compare Listings

Category: Press

Asset Performance Technologies, a cloud-based company, is on a mission to “transform maintenance from a cost to profit center in asset-intensive industries.”

http://thesiliconreview.com/magazines/asset-performance-technologies-a-cloud-based-company-is-on-a-mission-to-transform-maintenance-from-a-cost-to-profit-center-in-asset-intensive-industries-/

The world is busy; busy as a bee in producing what once upon a time was unattainable. And it seems humanity never fails to reward the world with better, faster, and bigger innovation. Innovation is bringing in great ideas, concepts, and designs to help the world be a better place. As Denis Waitley said, “You have all the reason in the world to achieve your grandest dreams. Imagination plus innovation equals realization” – a valid statement to be admired always.

The wise words of Mr. Waitley inspired a fledgling company to produce the finest innovative product in the market. They wanted to ensure customer, as well as company, success.

Christened Asset Performance Technologies, Inc. in 2004, they set out to be the company that specializes in creating balanced equipment reliability with plant availability for their customers. Asset Performance Technologies (APT) is founded on Reliability Centered Maintenance principles and works relentlessly in producing high quality Preventive Maintenance (PM) solutions at a very reasonable cost.

APT’s Founders were asked by EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute) to commercialize the PM Basis Database (PMBD) upon which they had been working for over a decade. APT re-branded it as the Asset Strategy Library (ASL) and has been growing this collection of expert content on how equipment fails and what to do about it since that time. More importantly, APT’s founders created software analytics and algorithms to optimize the recommend maintenance strategies for any business’ economic constraints (e.g. cost of a lost hour of production, cost of a maintenance man hour, etc.). EPRI’s PMBD arose in the US nuclear industry in response to the difficulties in applying the RCM analysis techniques to land-based facilities. And as a key part of the Nuclear Promise Initiative (to reduce O&M costs by 30% by 2018), the industry is now benefitting cloud software platform to increase equipment reliability while reducing maintenance cost. APT calls this Value Based Maintenance (which the industry has also adopted and published in an efficiency bulletin from the Nuclear Energy Institute or NEI). 20% of the electricity in the US is produced by 99 nuclear reactors at this time. Nuclear energy is a key part of US infrastructure and our national security – it is safe, reliable, and carbon neutral. APT is helping these plants compete more effectively with natural gas fired plants (which have much lower costs these days), according to Mark Benak, CEO of APT.

“A truly optimal maintenance plan financially balances the cost of equipment maintenance with the cost of equipment failure – APT is the only company to offer such unique capabilities.”Dr. David H. WorledgeChief Scientist & FounderGlenn R. HinchcliffePE, CMRP, Chief Engineer & FounderAsset Performance Technologies, a cloud-based company, is on a mission to “transform maintenance from a cost to profit center in asset-intensive industries.”

“Manage your equipment strategies anywhere – on our cloud-based planning platform,” says CEO APT’s first software product (called PRO-M) was a desktop application. It was retired in 2015 and replaced with Preventance.com to provide global scalability of the application as a “software as a service”, more aggressive named-user licensing plans, and predictable, recurring revenue for APT.

They used a traditional software pricing model (upfront fee + ongoing maintenance & support fees) for launching the desktop platform. Adoption was slow due in part to the relatively larger, up front and site-based licensing fees. The cloud-based software allows their customers to take much less financial risk up front, start with a few users, and grow their usage of Preventance throughout the enterprise as its successful usage is proven in house, adds Benak.

APT always try to listen to its customers for ideas on new features that would benefit the entire user community. However, the most important responses from our customers were around the need for consulting services to get the most out of Preventance and implement the recommended maintenance strategy changes. Hence, APT launched its Services division in late 2016 to fulfill this customer need. Plant operating are being asked by owners to do more with less. APT can provide those expert services and is building up its virtual reliability team for the entire industry.

“Nothing sells itself no matter how great you might think your product i s .”

You must aggressively market and sell your offering, acquire early adopters, and ensure they are successful in order to attract more clients, says Benak.

A company must be ready for any kind of turmoil; accepting this and working on removing the turmoil is what a company’s attitude should be. In the words of Ray Kroc, founder of McDonald’s, “If you’re not a risk taker, you should get the hell out of business.”

When offering new unique tools, it is difficult to acquire the early customers since the company was relatively un-known back then. Moreover, APT has customers in a variety of industries from power generation to chem/pet-rochem/refining, steel production, etc. Each market vertical believes it may be unique – however, the equipment from the same vendors across indus-tries. It is simply operated differently. APT’s content and software consider the functional importance and oper-ating context of the equipment when optimizing maintenance strategies so that our tools truly apply to any asset-intensive industry.

Beyond the horizon

The depth and breadth of the main-tenance strategy and failure mode content in the Asset Strategy Library (ASL) is unparalleled and already proven in the power generation in-dustry (by EPRI). APT’s Preventance software not only offers a technical basis but also a financial basis for maintenance decisions. A truly optimal maintenance plan financially balances the cost of equipment maintenance with the cost of equipment failure – APT is the only company to offer such unique capabilities.

APT is the only company to offer opti-mal (i.e. balanced) maintenance plans for asset-intensive industries. APT will continue offering new functionality to Prevantance.com, such as improved reliability and costmodels, reporting, asset registry tools, life cycle manage-ment, etc.

All set with a game-to-win, APT seems to know their way to the global plat-form as Benak confirms by stating, “APT hosts its application and data on Microsoft’s Azure platform and is help-ing asset-intensive industries realize the benefits of Software as a Service”

 

Roll out the Red carpet for the CEO

Mark Benak (CEO)
is a technologist, entrepreneur, and angel investor with over 25 years of experience. He also serves as Board Advisor to the Los Poblanos Historic Inn and Organic Farm and served as Chairman for Incitor (now xF Technologies), a novel developer of synthetic enzymes for biofuels. Mark co-founded InLight Solutions, developing optical solutions for Life Sciences problems.
Previously, he was a staff scientist with the institute for fluid mechanics (LSTM) at the University of Erlangen-Nuernberg and a research engineer with the Daimler-Benz AG in Stuttgart. Mark received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University
Posted on

Come visit APT (booth #316) at NEA 2017 next week in Scottsdale!

Will you also be attending the Nuclear Energy Assembly (NEA) conference next week in Scottsdale, AZ? If so, please stop by the APT booth (#316) and say hello. We’d be delighted to tell you more about why our customer, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, is being honored with a TIP (Top Industry Practice) award using our unique Preventance maintenance strategy optimization tools. We can also show how we can help you effectively implement Value Based Maintenance (VBM) to reduce your maintenance costs while maintaining equipment reliability. Along with our partner, ENERCON (booth #314), we can offer complete solutions to assist you in achieving your DNP goals.
We look forward to seeing you there!
Sincerely,
Posted on

BREAKING NEWS- APT is now officially part of the APM Ecosystem!

Market Guide for Asset Performance Management

Published: 08 March 2017 ID: G00321429

Analyst(s):

Summary

CIOs in utilities and other asset-intensive organizations can use this research to support the development of enterprise APM strategies. APM is a key element of the foundational technology that can help their organizations achieve higher levels of operational reliability, safety and efficiency.

Overview

Key Findings

  • Asset performance management (APM) solutions are widening in scope and decreasing in deployment cost due to market acceptance, increasing competition and maturation of enabling technologies such as advanced analytics, algorithms, cloud and the Internet of Things (IoT).
  • As APM solutions mature and cloud deployment increases, asset management will become a more collaborative process. Activities will be shared among asset owners, operators, service providers and OEMs.
  • Asset management strategies are beginning to shift from preventive to predictive — driven by innovation in enabling technologies and streamlined access to consistent operational technology (OT) data resulting from IT and OT alignment and integration.
  • As the market becomes more defined, vendors seek product differentiation by offering domain expertise and the alternative delivery option of APM as a service.

Recommendations

CIOs in asset-intensive industries who are optimizing foundational technologies should:

  • Develop and expand expertise in critical APM technology building blocks by adopting a bimodal approach and leveraging advanced analytics, IoT, algorithms and cloud computing.
  • Use third-party APM services to collect and analyze equipment data and support performance improvements, if internal IT resources are constrained or third-party collaboration is a goal.
  • Identify possible data sources to support a predictive strategy and determine what data analysis software can maximize your investment in multiple situations by collaborating with your operations team.
  • Determine the pros and cons of outsourcing data analysis core competencies by examining how much of product or domain expertise is unique and, therefore, should be a core competency.
  • Decrease unplanned work, mean time between failures and mean time to repair metrics by working closely with your maintenance and reliability departments.

Market Definition

Asset performance management is a market of software tools and applications designed for optimizing operational assets (such as plant, equipment and infrastructure) essential to the operation of an enterprise. Organizations invest in APM tools and technologies to reduce unplanned repair work, increase asset availability, minimize maintenance costs and reduce the risk of failure for critical assets. These products can also improve an organization’s ability to comply with regulations that prescribe how assets are inspected and maintained. APM uses data capture, integration, visualization and analytics to improve operations, maintenance timing, and which maintenance and inspection activities to perform on mission-critical assets.

There are two other related, but separate, asset management systems — enterprise asset management (EAM) and asset investment planning (AIP) — which are not assessed in this research, but it is important to understand the relationship (see Figure 1 for the relationship flow).

  • APM should not be confused with EAM, although integration between the two is common for triggering work orders in all levels of functional capabilities listed above and some EAM vendors have invested in APM. APM is designed for decision support; EAM is designed for maintenance execution. For more information on EAM, please see Note 1 or “Magic Quadrant for Energy and Utilities Enterprise Asset Management Software.” Some EAM vendors have an APM product strategy; most rely on partnerships with APM vendors. Sourcing an APM solution that is compatible with your EAM solution provides more ready-to-use integration.
  • APM also should not be confused with asset investment planning (AIP). APM is designed to support safe, reliable, and efficient operation of equipment and infrastructure. AIP is designed to support long-term capital investment decisions, most often used by local governments and regulated utilities. AIP takes data on asset condition, maintenance costs, criticality, budgets and risks, then analyzes it to produce capital investment plans over extended time horizons (see “Technology Overview for Utility Asset Investment Planning” ). The two solution types often use the same data and similar analytical techniques, but for different purposes. There is no overlap between APM and AIP solution providers.
Figure 1. Data Flow in Asset Management Systems

Research image courtesy of Gartner, Inc.

Source: Gartner (March 2017)

APM includes specific functional capabilities (organized by APM category) that require data collection and aggregation from data historians and other operational data stores for the purposes of analysis (see Table 1).

Table 1.   APM Capabilities and Categories

Capability

Processes and Tools

Asset Strategy and Risk Management

Data collection and aggregation from EAM systems.

Certified integration with major EAM systems for updating maintenance plans.

Various analysis techniques and tools for calculating risk and assessing criticality, including:

  • Weibull analysis — Statistical distribution of asset life data from a representative set of sample units to predict the life of an asset.
  • Risk-based inspection (RBI) — Analysis methodology and process that requires qualitative or quantitative assessment of the probability of failure (PoF) and the consequence of failure (CoF) associated with each equipment item.
  • Fault tree analysis (FTA) — A deductive failure analysis method that models the pathways within a system that can lead to failures or undesired results.
  • Mechanical integrity — Management of critical process equipment to ensure it is designed and installed correctly, and that it operates and is maintained properly (that is, all elements are fit for service).
  • Safety integrity level (SIL) analysis — A method to indicate the tolerable failure rate of a particular safety function.
  • Library of failure modes and recommended practices.

Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM)

Data collection and aggregation from EAM systems.

Root cause failure analysis — Actions taken to determine why a particular failure or issue exists and correcting those causes.

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) — A method to identify where and how an asset might fail and to assess the relative impact of different failures.

Predictive Asset Management

Statistical modeling/regression analysis of physically observable characteristics in a piece of equipment, recorded over a period of time.

Neural network analysis — Computational data model that can capture and represent complex input/output relationships.

Machine learning to determine the related characteristics that are observable in a failure of equipment or parts so as to use that as the basis of future failure indicators.

Proprietary algorithms.

Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM)

Rule engines — To determine and record tolerance levels for physically observable characteristics in a piece of equipment.

Source: Gartner (March 2017)

Gartner surveyed vendors for the types of APM customer deployments organized by APM category. Figure 2 summarizes responses from 10 leading APM vendors.

Figure 2. Customer Deployment Capabilities Reported by APM Vendors

Research image courtesy of Gartner, Inc.

The figure represents the number of customer use cases added up across all reported vendors.
Vendors may indicate multiple use cases per customer.

Source: Gartner (March 2017)

Market Direction

APM Adoption Is Accelerating, but at a Varied Pace

APM is a critical investment area for asset-intensive industries, including manufacturing, mining, oil and gas, transportation, and utilities (see “Asset Performance Management Transforms How Operational Assets Are Managed and Maintained” ). Successful APM deployments can deliver measurable improvements in availability, as well as reduce maintenance and inventory carrying costs. Some aspects of APM have been practiced for more than 10 years, mostly by the largest companies in a handful of industries. Its broader adoption has been stalled until recently by a combination of internal and external factors, including cost/budget, skills, delegation of responsibilities and maturity of technology. In prior years, there was a need to build your own or apply complex mathematical tools to the problem.

Recently, APM has become more productized and is maturing into a more normal part of business. This is, in part, due to rapid innovation in enabling technologies such as IoT, advanced analytics and algorithms in asset-intensive industries. These are widening the scope and decreasing the deployment cost, aiding more widespread awareness and use of APM. The promise of reduced maintenance cost and downtime, coupled with higher levels of operational reliability, is attracting other industries. APM adoption is progressing at a varied pace among industries. Those that depend on the success of their assets such as manufacturing, utilities and natural resources industries tend to be further along in their asset management strategy, and usually invest more heavily in APM (see Figure 3). Other industries that rely on physical assets to some degree, such as retail and public sector, are beginning to embark on this journey, but may not invest as heavily in APM solutions (see “Differentiation in Asset-Centric Companies” ).

Figure 3. APM Significance by Industry

Research image courtesy of Gartner, Inc.

Source: Gartner (March 2017)

Not all organizations are mature enough to invest in APM. In some instances, there may be immature asset management processes and a standard EAM system of record. In that situation, the better investment may be to upgrade the existing EAM system and/or invest in a data-cleansing project. APM is not an execution system and, therefore, depends on EAM to execute its recommendations and provide feedback on the results (as portrayed in Figure 4, which illustrates the maintenance and reliability flows between the two systems). Before investing in APM, organizations need to assess the maturity of their EAM system and have a sustainable integration plan between the two.

Figure 4. Maintenance and Reliability Flows

Research image courtesy of Gartner, Inc.

Source: Gartner (March 2017)

Relationship Between Asset Owner/Operators and OEMs

APM offers the potential for new business models, and this will, ultimately, change the dynamic between owner/operators of assets and OEMs in a number of industries. This is a long-term trend that will depend on a number of factors:

  • The rate of OEMs investing in APM themselves, with the goal of using APM to deliver new service offerings.
  • The capability and agreement of owners/operators to share maintenance history and condition data with their OEMs, directly or via a cloud service through a digital twin (see “Predicts 2017: IT and OT Convergence Will Create New Challenges and Opportunities” ). This could lead to a shift from operator-as-maintainer to manufacturer being maintainer. Manufacturers could evaluate equipment field performance, which enables conditioned-based maintenance, diagnostics and preventive maintenance, while supporting future design improvements.
  • The emergence of third-party data aggregators, taking data off sensors and offering data as a service to OEMs and owner/operators. This is evident in adjacent markets such as retail and finance, and is expected in the equipment domain, which may accelerate the process and address data ownership issues.
  • The complexity of an owner/operator’s portfolio of assets and the diversity of its OEM relationships. A large portfolio of diverse assets might make some forms of OEM collaboration impractical, or the operator could also revert to building its own in-house equivalent analytics service instead of going to multiple vendors. The changing relationship between owner/operators and OEMs will play out over 10 or more years. In the meantime, we may see a parallel development in the future, where OEMs, vendors offering APM as a service and APM vendors supply their own capability .

Enabling Technologies and Market Opportunities Are Driving the Solution Universe

Recent advances in core technologies, such as IoT (see “The Internet of Things Revolution: Impact on Operational Technology Ecosystems” ) and advanced analytics (see “Using Advanced Analytics to Predict Equipment Failure” ), have spurred concurrent advances in the APM market. For example, IoT-driven innovation is rapidly increasing the volume and variety of data available to assess asset condition, enabling broad expansion of APM use cases (see “The Internet of Things Is Accelerating Asset Performance Management Innovation and Adoption” ). Advanced analytics capability is becoming a competitive differentiator in the market, which is aiding the maturity of asset maintenance strategies from preventive to predictive (see “Asset Management and Reliability: A Strategic Roadmap” ). In addition, because of cost, complexity and time, more APM vendors are now providing APM-as-a-service offerings. This addresses the needs of organizations that do not have the data capabilities already in-house. Cloud is also having an impact by lowering the barriers to the use of APM itself and aiding the emergence of APM-as-a-service offering.

Diversity in the Market Is Increasing

The rising interest in APM is creating a diverse set of market participants, including independent software vendors (ISVs) and OEMs. Many of these vendors have invested substantially to create and deliver new APM solutions.

APM acquisition activity is reflective of growing interest, and is expected to continue. Recent acquisitions include:

  • AspenTech acquired Mtell
  • Bentley Systems acquired C3global (to add to its acquisition of Ivara in 2012)
  • GE Digital acquired Meridium (to combine with SmartSignal as part of Predix)
  • Schneider Electric bought InStep Software in 2014

Other large OEMs are also making investments in APM to support their service businesses, and expand their existing APM software businesses.

Vendors such as SAP, Infor, GE and others have begun investing heavily in domain expertise. They are hiring talent with relevant industry experience, as well as bringing in technical expertise and creating internal data science/analytic groups, as another product differentiator. However, these efforts are just taking root, and their long-term impact on the market is yet to be determined.

We fully expect to see similar activity continue. The next few years will bring a significant amount of new activity and consolidation in the market. Vendors of all types recognize that delivering a comprehensive APM platform will expand their market opportunities.

Not all buyers are looking for a comprehensive APM platform. For them, there is still a growing market of vendors that deliver APM solutions to address a specific application. For example:

  • ABB’s Asset Health Center (based on its acquisition of Obvient Strategies in 2011) is primarily focused on monitoring the health of critical power transformers, and related substation equipment, for the electrical transmission and distribution industry.
  • Detechtion Technologies is an established provider of APM software and services for monitoring and managing gas compressors in the upstream oil and gas industry.
  • DNV GL has the product Cascade, which is focused on predictive analytics for the power sector.

These, and other targeted solutions, continue to serve specific APM constituencies.

Market Analysis

The APM market is composed of two distinct, but overlapping, submarkets. One is a market of APM platform vendors. The other is a market of asset analysis solutions used to support specific analytical approaches or, in some instances, specific classes of assets.

Platform Vendors

Platform vendors deliver comprehensive APM platforms for:

  • Aggregating asset data
  • Analyzing the data
  • Creating an asset management strategy based on risk factors, criticality and predicted outcomes

APM platform vendors support a comprehensive range of risk assessment and management methodologies (as described in the Market Definition section). They also provide integration with EAM systems and operational data stores, such as data historians. If deployed as an enterprise system, an APM platform becomes the focal point for an organization’s asset management strategy and, where applicable, its adherence to the ISO 55000 standard for physical asset management.

An organization should not automatically select a platform vendor because it has a comprehensive platform. These offerings should be considered only if your organization is in the market for an integrated product set based on the needs of your organization.

Asset Analysis Vendors

Asset analysis vendors typically provide a suite of capabilities for predicting equipment failure that includes:

  • Aggregation of data from various operational data sources
  • Application of advanced analytics to discern patterns from the data
  • Visualization to identify potential failure patterns

These vendors may also include creation of alerts and workflow to support decision process.

These capabilities can be applied to a broad spectrum of different types of equipment. Most asset analysis tools are general in nature, while a few target a specific class of asset. They can be used strategically or tactically as part of a more comprehensive asset management strategy.

Other APM Ecosystem Vendors

The market is also supported by vendor products that aren’t widely used as APM solutions per se, but serve an essential role in the APM ecosystem. Some, such as Asset Performance Technologies, primarily provide APM content to other solution providers. Others, such as the data historian OSIsoft, primarily provide the operational data necessary to support APM. The historian’s data infrastructure also has been used by customers as a platform to build unique CBM solutions. (Note: Given the large number of existing and potential CBM solutions in the market, we have chosen not to highlight vendors that do only CBM. However, a number of the vendors represented in this Market Guide also can support a CBM project.)

The decision on which APM solutions and techniques to use is driven by the types of assets an organization needs to manage, as well as available solutions. No APM vendor currently provides all of the capabilities required to support all APM strategies and manage all classes of assets across all industries. Figure 5 illustrates the field-proven capabilities of vendors represented in this Market Guide. It is not a complete list of existing solutions, but does include the major APM vendors.

Figure 5. Capabilities of Representative APM Vendors

Research image courtesy of Gartner, Inc.

Green — Comprehensive, cross-industry capabilities
Yellow — Limited or unproven capabilities
* Capabilities listed are provided by multiple products of different origin (see the Representative Vendors section).

Source: Gartner (March 2017)

Representative Vendors

The vendors listed in this Market Guide do not imply an exhaustive list. This section is intended to provide more understanding of the market and its offerings.

APM Platform Vendors

Bentley Systems

Bentley is an ISV based in Exton, Pennsylvania. Bentley offers its AssetWise suite of APM products, including the acquisitions Ivara and C3global. Most AssetWise customers are in North America and Western Europe, and span a range of industries.

AssetWise Asset Lifecycle Information Management (ALIM) provides structured control of asset information and managed change throughout the asset life cycle beyond just APM. AssetWise Asset Reliability supports core APM functions with a map-based mobile offering for inspections. AssetWise Operational Analytics is an operational intelligence/predictive analytics product that serves three primary functions — operational data capture, data analysis and visualization/reporting. It is complementary to AssetWise Asset Reliability with limited overlap. AssetWise Enterprise Interoperability facilitates the interoperation of multiple data sources and includes predefined connectors for many third-party systems, such as EAMs, as well as supports a number of exchange standards.

Meridium

Meridium (acquired by GE Digital in September 2016) is an APM ISV based in Roanoke, Virginia. Founded in 1993, it initially focused on the oil and gas, and chemical industries, but has since expanded into manufacturing, mining, transportation and utilities.

Meridium offers a suite of APM products to include machinery and equipment health, reliability management, asset strategy optimization, and compliance and integrity management. Key capabilities include data integration to common EAM and condition monitoring systems, risk and criticality analysis, failure analytics and simulations, asset strategy optimization, and industry APM benchmarking through Asset Answers. Integration with the GE Bently Nevada System 1/SmartSignal products existed prior to the Meridium’s acquisition by GE, and full integration of the combined APM portfolio began immediately after the acquisition in September 2016 (see the GE Digital profile).

Asset Analysis Vendors

ABB

ABB is a global power and industrial automation company based in Zurich, Switzerland. Its Enterprise Software product group provides a suite of software products, including two independent EAM products. It has two APM products — Equipment Reliability (ER) and Asset Health Center (the latter is based on the FocalPoint analytical toolkit that came with its acquisition of Obvient Strategies).

Asset Health Center has been sold to utilities primarily for management of transmission assets, specifically the health and risk (of failure) assessment of critical bulk power transformers, circuit breakers and energy storage batteries. The solution can be deployed on-site, hosted or managed and in the Microsoft Azure cloud. ER was designed as a solution to help enforce standards related to equipment reliability and work management, specifically to support INPO AP-913 compliance in the nuclear power industry and has been folded under the Asset Health Center banner. Most Asset Health Center and ER Suite customers are in North America.

Detechtion Technologies

Detechtion Technologies is an APM software and service provider based in Houston, Texas, with offices in Calgary, Canada, and Brisbane, Australia. It offers its Enalysis product for gas compression fleet monitoring, alerting and optimization as a cloud-based service only. The product was built over many years of gas compressor troubleshooting service engagements, and has few direct competitors. Its customers are mostly in the upstream and midstream sectors of the oil and gas industry. The majority of its business is in North America, but it also has clients in Australia.

The vendor’s APM offering uses proprietary algorithms to determine the exact operating status of compressors from both a production and maintenance viewpoint. This can be delivered through multiple platforms, including computers, tablets and phones. It also offers its remote workers (with no access to the internet) a comprehensive set of PDF reports delivered by email for review as they travel through their oil and gas routes.

In October 2016, Detechtion acquired Enbase, which provides SCADA, mobile applications and predictive analytics for the oil and gas industry. Enbase will be integrated under the Detechtion brand and extend the capabilities for wellhead chemical injection and compression assets.

GE Digital

GE Digital , in 2016, acquired Meridium (APM; see the Meridium profile), Bit Stew Systems (data management and integration), ServiceMax (field service management solutions) and Wise.io (machine learning). GE offers a number of APM-focused solutions acquired over a number of years, including SmartSignal, Bently Nevada System 1 and GE Digital Historian, as well as new Predix APM applications.

GE has streamlined APM to be a horizontal solution built on the Predix platform, which can be contextualized for industry verticals. GE also offers a number of vertical-specific APM products, many of which it delivers as part of its OEM service businesses, including GE Power and GE Oil & Gas. The APM horizontal solutions are deployed across a range of industries, including manufacturing, oil and gas, chemicals, transportation, mining, and utilities. In addition, GE provides an APM service offering based on the SmartSignal product with its Industrial Performance & Reliability Center (IPRC), which is an asset performance monitoring service delivered via the web.

Previously GE Oil & Gas formed a partnership with Meridium in 2014 to develop a joint APM product — Production Asset Reliability. Some components of the GE Digital and Meridium APM software have already been integrated and brought to market by combining legacy functionality from both systems by integrating through a common user interface and platform data synchronization. The full integration for GE Digital’s and Meridium’s APM software across the entire breadth of product functionality is expected to continue in 2017. For information on the complete set of APM solutions and capabilities, now available from GE Digital, see the Meridium profile.

Mtell

Mtell (recently acquired by AspenTech) is an APM ISV based in San Diego, California. Although it has been in existence for much longer, its focus on APM as a product category began in 2006. Mtell’s primary APM offering is Previse, a predictive analytics and prescriptive maintenance asset management solution that can be applied to a broad range of assets. Using machine learning, Previse automatically analyzes large volumes of operational and maintenance data to discover patterns that indicate impending failure and sends notifications. Previse has been deployed in a number of asset-intensive industries, including oil and gas, transportation, chemicals, water, mining and pharmaceuticals.

SAP

SAP , founded in 1972, is a global enterprise application software vendor based in Walldorf, Germany. SAP’s Predictive Maintenance and Service and SAP Asset Intelligence Network are integrated with SAP EAM. In November 2014, it launched “SAP Predictive Maintenance and Service, cloud edition,” which allows reliability engineers and data scientists to leverage a set of prediction models and machine learning algorithms in Hana. It offers integration with OSIsoft’s PI System product, which is used to load asset data collected via sensors to be stored in SAP Hana, and has certified interfaces with OSI data historian. SAP services a variety of industries, including oil and gas, utilities, and manufacturing. SAP’s Condition-Based Maintenance capability is provided through the SAP Plant Maintenance (PM) module (EAM solution), which has been available for many years.

SAS

SAS is a business intelligence, analytics and data science ISV. It is based in Cary, North Carolina, with offices worldwide. SAS was founded in 1976, and can claim a long history of helping businesses apply advanced analytics to discover patterns in large data and complex sets. It offers an APM solution — SAS Asset Performance Analytics (first released under the name SAS Predictive Asset Maintenance, which is now a part of the SAS Quality Analytics Suite). Asset Performance Analytics uses a variety of analytical approaches, including time series regression and neural networks to model failure modes for specific assets. SAS’s APM business is distributed across the energy, oil and gas, and manufacturing industries. It also is broadly distributed across various regions of the world. In addition to SAS’s own Professional Services Division, it partners with Wipro, Accenture, CT Global Solutions and Pro Technology for implementations.

Schneider Electric

Schneider Electric is a global energy management and automation company, with headquarters in Rueil-Malmaison, France. Its software line of business offers the Avantis family of asset management products and services. These include an EAM product and a few APM products. The APM products it offers include Avantis PRO EAM, Avantis Condition Manager (CM) and Avantis PRiSM (which came with the 2014 acquisition of InStep Software). Avantis Condition Manager is a CBM product that integrates with Avantis PRO EAM and other EAM products. PRiSM is a predictive asset management solution that has been primarily deployed in the utility industry for predicting the failure of power generation, transmission and distribution equipment through use of models and machine learning. Other customer deployments exist in the oil and gas, food and beverage, metals, mining, and mineral industries.

Other APM Ecosystem Vendors

Asset Performance Technologies

Asset Performance Technologies is a small provider of APM content and software based in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Its content offering is Asset Strategy Library (ASL), consisting of an extensive library of failure modes and asset strategies for industrial equipment. It primarily sells ASL through APM vendors such as Bentley and Meridium (recently acquired by GE Digital). In addition, it offers an APM software product — Preventance — that leverages the ASL library. Although not as comprehensive, or as well-established, as similar APM products, it is has been successfully utilized by small to midsize asset-intensive businesses with an interest in utilizing the recommendations in ASL in lieu of a major RCM project. The majority of customers are in the Power Generation sector.

DNV GL

DNV GL , headquartered in Norway, is a provider of classification, technical assurance, software and advisory services. Its utility-oriented product, known as Cascade software, for technical asset management and predictive maintenance consolidates equipment diagnostics, nameplate and real-time data, providing equipment statuses. It can be integrated with most leading enterprise resource planning (ERP and EAM) systems. The utility-specific software interfaces with a wide variety of test equipment, as well as real-time and asset repository data, and allows SCADA and online-monitoring data to be automatically evaluated and captured as equipment reads.

MaxGrip

MaxGrip is an APM ISV and service provider based in Utrecht, Netherlands, with offices in the U.S. and Asia/Pacific. Founded in 1997 as a maintenance and reliability service organization, it later expanded into a software business in 2000. The company offers three APM software products: Optimizer+, which interfaces with SAP, Infor, IBM and Ultimo EAM systems; strEAM+, which embeds APM functionality in IBM Maximo; and APMSmartApps, which are mobile, light apps to simplify APM. The APMSmartApps are built to work on all versions of SAP. In February 2015 — based on a partnership with Lloyd’s Register Energy — MaxGrip released a new risk-based inspection module to add to the MaxGrip APM portfolio called strEAM+ RBI. MaxGrip’s APM customers span a broad cross-section of industries, with a concentration in oil and gas, chemical, utilities, and food and beverage. It has customers in all regions of the world, but is particularly well-established in Western Europe. (MaxGrip did not participate in the vendor survey to be placed in the above APM submarket categories.)

OSIsoft

OSIsoft is a large privately held, process data infrastructure vendor based in San Leandro, California. Its PI System is widely used by asset-intensive organizations to aggregate and manage their process data. As such, many of the vendors in this Market Guide rely on PI System for the operational data required for APM. PI System has also been used to develop custom CBM solutions in agriculture, chemicals, oil and gas, and utilities. These custom CBM applications typically use PI System’s Asset Framework (AF), which can be used to define hierarchies of assets and process flows between assets for process data, event-framed data, performing calculations on assets, and integration with EAM systems to trigger maintenance work orders based on predefined conditions. The PI System can also be linked to off-the-shelf CBM solutions. In 2015, OSIsoft released the PI Integrator for Business Analytics, a software integration product, which enables sensor-based data captured within the PI System with existing advanced analytics and visualization tools within the industry. That was followed by release of PI Integrator for Microsoft Azure in 2016. In January 2016, OSIsoft announced a global reseller agreement with SAP. SAP will resell the OSIsoft solution as the SAP Hana IoT Connector by OSIsoft through its global network of affiliated customers and business partners.

Market Recommendations

While a comprehensive APM platform solution would deliver value for almost any organization, all the components of these types of solutions may not be needed for most organizations, and the value should be weighed against the investment and total cost of ownership. More specifically, when evaluating APM options, consider:

  • The importance of good quality data in your EAM systems. Assess your data quality, and if there are deficiencies, then invest in upgrading your EAM systems and/or an asset data-cleansing project before investing in APM.
  • The importance of integration with EAM. Ensure there is an interface to your EAM to be able to execute APM recommendations directly in the transactional EAM system.
  • The importance of sufficient, secure, sustainable and relevant operational technology data. If the data doesn’t exist or is not accessible, then invest in deploying sensors and process data management infrastructure before embarking on an APM project. Additionally, look at the underlying governance of the OT systems to ensure you have a documented, secure and stable basis for OT data architecture. If you are considering APM-as-a-service options, determine if outsourcing the core competency of data analysis is beneficial in your long-term plan, or, alternatively, if you should build competencies in-house.
  • The APM vendor’s experience with your specific use case. Does it have customers already using the product to manage the performance of similar assets? Most APM vendors serve a variety of industries and asset types, but some are quite specific and are developing “domain expertise” offerings. Pick a solution that fits your scope and budget.
  • The alignment between the vendor’s APM product roadmap and your own long-term equipment reliability strategy (assuming you have one). Not all APM vendors have an expansive product strategy. If your long-term plan includes expanding the scope of the solution to encompass different assets, and different approaches to managing their performance, then invest in an APM platform vendor solution. If your organization only needs to support specific analytical approaches or specific classes of assets, then an APM asset analysis vendor may be more suitable.
  • The ability of the solution to support collaboration across the organization, as well as with external business partners, such as OEMs. Cloud technology is changing asset management collaboration dynamics and opening the door to new asset management business models. If you are considering a more collaborative asset management model, invest in APM solutions that support, or will support, the necessary collaboration.

Evidence

Gartner received vendor briefings and associated material from 10 APM vendors (most have global reach, but some are only regional) from July through October 2016. Gartner also surveyed secondary research sources for information on market trends and vendor activity.

Note 1
Definitions

Enterprise asset management includes planning and scheduling, work order creation, maintenance history, and inventory and procurement, as well as equipment, component and asset tracking for assemblies of equipment. In some instances, the functionality is extended by addition of basic financial management modules, such as accounts payable, cost recording in ledgers and HR functions, such as a maintenance skills database (see “Magic Quadrant for Energy and Utilities Enterprise Asset Management Software” ). While some EAM vendors have an APM product strategy, most rely on partnerships.

ISO 55000 is an international standard covering management of physical assets. Initially a Publicly Available Specification (PAS 55) published by the British Standards Institution in 2004, the ISO 55000 series of asset management standards was launched in January 2014.

Posted on

Web-based Maintenance Optimization Platform providing Preventative Analysis and a Comprehensive Library of Asset Strategies for Industrial Equipment and Nuclear Power Plants

Mark S. Benak

Chief Executive Officer

 

Asset Performance Technologies, Inc.

www.assetperformanceinc.com

 

Interview conducted by:

Lynn Fosse, Senior Editor, CEOCFO Magazine, Published – April 3, 2017

 

CEOCFO: Mr. Benak, what is the focus for Asset Performance Technologies today? 

Mr. Benak: Our primary focus is the Nuclear Promise Initiative. I do not know if you have heard about it in the popular press yet, but America’s nuclear power plants are struggling to be competitive in the power markets. That is to say that it is cheaper to produce electricity from natural gas plants. We are reading about certain plants being shut down. As a result, the industry banded together and created the Nuclear Promise Initiative, which is an initiative to cut O&M (Operations & Maintenance) costs by thirty percent. The original goal was 2018. I think they are a little behind schedule. However, top on that list for cutting costs in the nuclear power plant is optimizing their maintenance plans and that is exactly the products & services my company offers.

 

CEOCFO: Is cost the only factor that is barring people from nuclear today?

Mr. Benak: I am sure it does at some level, depending on who you talk to. I think the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan nearly six years ago reminded us that, although nuclear power is clean, safe and reliable in general, when things go bad they can go really bad. However, that was in isolated incident in my opinion, and there is probably a whole other interview to talk about some of the perhaps design issues and other things that could have been avoided in that case. However, let me put it this way, that accident in Japan slowed down the construction of many new plants in the US and probably globally, from which we are just starting to recover. Now, when I talk about the industry having to become more cost competitive, it is low electricity prices from natural gas or it is aging infrastructure. These are older plants. Many of them were on forty year licenses that are now coming up for renewal. They are trying to extend to sixty years, so they are “boldly going where no one has gone before”. Hence, those questions are coming out as well as historically, nuclear has had relatively high fixed costs. They are trying to address all those issues.

 

CEOCFO: What gives you the confidence that you can address some of these in a way that the group will be happy with? What do you understand to help you craft a solution or strategy?

Mr. Benak: Unlike most industries I think the nuclear industry, and this dates back twenty-five plus years ago, realizes that a problem at anyone’s plant is really a problem for the industry. I think that is probably what drives it. Let me say that up front. They work very well together. In banding together around the Nuclear Promise Initiative there have been, for the past probably close to two years, a variety of committees and discussions within the greater initiative to talk about, “Okay, how are we going to cut costs and what are our priorities for doing so?” High on that list is maintenance optimization. I think the nuclear industry realizes that it is probably over maintaining certain assets that are less critical in nature and perhaps there is a need to maintain other assets better, although I think it is more the former point.

 

CEOCFO: Why have they turned to you? What is it that you bring to the table, giving the nuclear industry confidence in APT?

Mr. Benak: That is a very good question. There are actually two aspects to my response to that question. The first aspect is that the data portion of our solution has its history in the nuclear power history from the Electric Power Research Institute or EPRI. This template based approach to maintenance offers the RCM (Reliability Centered Maintenance) analysis on a variety of equipment types for all known operating contexts; the nuclear industry championed that approach through the expert facilitation of my colleagues twenty plus years ago. My colleagues, the cofounders of our company, have been the ones exclusively facilitating that data collection for over 2 decades. Therefore, we have got that connection on the content or data side of the equation to the Electric Power Research Institute, which gives us some credibility for the industry. The second aspect is that we have developed software that runs on top of those data to make them better, to make these maintenance strategies more appropriate for any plant, including a nuclear power plant. We are very fortunate that one of our marquis customers is the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station; they have been a customer since 2010. They not only were an early adopter of the technology, but they took our tools and they built a process around it called Value Based Maintenance (VBM) – which is now being adopted by the industry. The reason that is important is, as we talked in our last interview, it is one thing to optimize your strategies and predict what is going to happen. It is another thing to track what is truly happening, to track the results of those predictions. Palo Verde has done that! They have shown that this works. They have shown that their costs are coming down and the entire industry is now taking notice.

 

CEOCFO: How are you working with these companies now? Are you working with them as a group?

Mr. Benak: We would like to work with them in groups. We are now working with them individually as we propose the idea of working more as a group. However, the way we engage individually is really two-fold when it comes down to it. It is licenses. Software licenses to use our cloud based tools. That is another thing we have launched since we last spoke; that all of our tools are available in a web-based format. You just need a browser and an internet connection to access them. The software license is one aspect. The second is services; whether we are training you how to use the software, or more importantly, we are now being asked to come in and help do the work for the plant. That is because experienced reliability personnel are in high demand, but they are in short supply these days. Often, these companies need to contract out those services.

 

CEOCFO: Would you give us a couple of examples?

Mr. Benak: I will offer some examples from one of our customers. Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, of whom I just spoke. Non-critical, low voltage breakers. In Palo Verde, those are outside. Palo Verde is just outside of Phoenix, so it is hot and dusty. These breakers were outside; they had a roof over them, but no walls near the cooling towers. Therefore, they were being exposed to heat and probably dust. Occasionally the Phoenix area gets those crazy Middle Eastern type dust storms called “haboobs,” not to mention it can be windy and blowing sand everywhere, not to mention moisture and perhaps corrosive chemicals coming off the cooling towers. I forget the exact details, but at the time a few years ago Palo Verde was simply replacing the breakers every six years or so. Instead, by using our platform they realized if that they just built an enclosure around the breakers, put those breakers into a mild, but not a severe operating environment, they could save something like $3,000 per year per breaker. They have 158 of those breakers. Therefore, in round numbers, that is a half a million dollars in annual cost savings, just by putting a wall around those breakers. That is savings every year from now going forward, because they are not overspending on their breaker maintenance. Another example would be non-critical, low voltage motors. Notice that I am not talking about critical equipment. I am not talking about the reactors themselves. I am talking about all the stuff that goes around the reactors; for example, non-critical, low voltage motors. When Palo Verde went to analyze their low voltage motor maintenance program using our tools, they realized that they were spending about 3 hours per motor to grease them. Three (3) hours for the entire lubrication process. That is, a person gets the order to go do the work, collects up the paperwork, collects up the tools, goes and finds the motor, greases the motor and reports back out to the computerized maintenance management system (CMMS). That was taking 3 hours. Our software concluded, “Wait a minute, if it is taking you 3 hours, do not bother greasing them, just let them run to failure. That is too expensive.” That did not sit well with the engineers. Therefore, maintenance and engineering sat down and discussed, “We are uncomfortable letting them run to failure. It is rotating equipment. We need to lubricate it.” Because of those discussions, instead of doing these single motor lubrications, they created what they call their Lube King program. Now, I am told they have maintenance personnel, who every day get a list of all the motors they need to lubricate that day. They were able to take that 3-hour time to lubricate a motor down to half an hour. Our software tool concluded, “At half an hour, sure! That is very beneficial of you to lube your motor; you should do that. You will save money.” For one further example, they also looked at non-critical Air Operated Valves or AOVs. There were able to optimize the maintenance programs to show significant cost savings on the order of several hundred thousand dollars per year. However, I will never forget the day when the head of Reliability, the PM Program Owner at Palo Verde called me and said, “You know Mark, we are looking at our non-critical AOVs, and we realize in using your tool that several valves were very critical. As a matter of fact, they are single point vulnerabilities (SPVs). That means when they fail, the plant trips. We have had failures in the past that cost us 2 million dollars per day. We looked at your library and realized we were missing a maintenance task that probably would have prevented those failures from happening!”

 

CEOCFO: That is a big deal! How do you help guide your clients at what to look for in your asset library?

Mr. Benak: During the sales process, we offer trial evaluations of our tools. They are 30 days free of charge, no strings attached. In the process of getting to a trial, we try to encourage the customer to think about which equipment types are causing problems today, which are failing more often than they should. For example, which ones are costing you too much money? That is generally how we engage a customer with the software licenses. If we are providing services around Value Based Maintenance, there is a step-by-step approach to this methodology. Step one is understanding your cost basis, meaning understanding what your equipment is costing you to run today. The mantra here is the Pareto principle. Find those couple of equipment types that are causing you the most pain: apply the 80/20 rule where twenty percent of the equipment is probably causing you eighty percent of the headaches and cost. Identify which equipment types are costing you too much money; those are they types you seek to optimize first. That is because you are going to get the biggest gains from this type of analysis.

 

CEOCFO: Can companies use your tools or look to you proactively when thinking of replacing equipment?

Mr. Benak: Definitely! That is the life cycle costing issue that is also referred to nowadays as Asset Investment Planning (AIP): when do I need to replace or purchase new equipment. We play a role in that in that and we hope to play a bigger role in the future – for which we are exploring partnerships now. However, we play a role in those discussions in that as an asset ages, you likely have some history on failures it has already seen, if any. Our tools can help you analyze what is the anticipated failure rate of this equipment, given how it is operated as well as the costs associated with operating it. I am thinking of a particular example from a certain semiconductor manufacturer (that will remain nameless), where they had industrial chillers that were over twenty years old. They asked us the question, “What do we need to worry about now?” This offered us the opportunity to explain, “You just need to look at all the failure modes which can occur after twenty years. Those are the ones you need to be concerned about now.”

 

CEOCFO: What else is going on at APT?

Mr. Benak: Certainly, the Nuclear Promise Initiative has put a lot of attention around optimizing equipment maintenance cost; that is to say, to get the reliability you need at a maintenance cost you can afford. This is where much of our attention has been lately. We also focus on partnerships around our content and software. We are pleased to report that one of our partners, a company called Meridium, who resells our content library in its APM software, was recently acquired by GE Digital. That has been good for APT. We are developing new partnerships as well. Many of those seem to be forming around the Internet of Things (IoT), of which you may have heard. This is the industrial internet; sensors in the plants that are connected to the internet so equipment health data can be easily collected and analyzed. There are many vendors out there that provide those systems and provide some of the algorithms to analyze those data. What they are interested in talking with us about at APT is, “I want to provide better prognostics to my customer, the operator of the equipment.” I will give you a concrete example. For example, let’s say there is a bearing temperature alarm on a motor. What subset of failure modes could have caused it and what is the probability of each of those occurring. That is the type of information that my company can provide.

 

CEOCFO: Can you keep up with the demand?

Mr. Benak: We are a small company that is looking to scale quickly. Our approach is to high key personnel out of the nuclear industry, who not only know most of the other companies and personnel, but also have the expertise and knowledge to help us scale quickly.

 

CEOCFO: Why choose Asset Performance Technologies?

Mr. Benak: That is a good question. We talk a lot these days about competitiveness of American and/or North American manufacturing and processing operations. Politics aside, the world economy is essentially “flat” now. As a country, we have got to be able to compete globally. Part of that competition is being able to provide goods and services at a competitive cost. That is, to build and sustain profitable businesses. In heavy industries which are often called asset intensive industries, safety plus reliability equals profitability. My company helps you improve the safety and reliability of your equipment so that you will be profitable in the global economy.

Posted on

Asset Strategy Library (ASL) sets new standard for Preventive Maintenance Optimization (PMO) in Asset Performance Management (APM) programs in asset-intensive industries

Asset Strategy Library (ASL) sets new standard for Preventive Maintenance Optimization (PMO) in Asset Performance Management (APM) programs in asset-intensive industries
             
2/28/2017 Albuquerque, NM – Asset Performance Technologies, Inc. (APT) announced today its latest version of the Asset Strategy Library (ASL) is now available to the industrial market.
The ASL is the most comprehensive asset library that enables processing and manufacturing organizations to avoid unplanned asset failures. With its expert maintenance recommendations supported by in-depth failure modes and effect analysis (FMEA) tables (across all known operating contexts), this extensive library contains over 720 equipment types commonly found in asset-intensive industries and includes:
  • 52,000 Degradation Mechanisms or FMEA rows (70 per type)
  • 4,400 PM Tasks and Intervals (6 per type)
  • 156,000 As-Found Reportable Conditions (216 per type)
Under continuous development and refinement over the past 20 years, the ASL is a unique database that provides access to detailed equipment knowledge from experienced leaders within the Asset Performance Management (APM) industry. Incorporating over 29,000 man-years of experience from equipment experts, ASL can improve profitability and shorten the time to value of your Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) and other APM software implementations.
“Expediting Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) analysis is a great way to improve your company’s performance, says Mark Benak, CEO of APT. Your ability to increase revenue for your business by doing the right maintenance at the right times starts with the right knowledge, and we provide that to our customers.”

ASL is the foundation for  APT’s  maintenance optimization tools called  Preventance™.  Meridium (now a part of GE Digital) and

Bentley Systems


 also provide the ASL within their respective APM software suites.

About Asset Performance Technologies
Asset Performance Technologies, Inc. (APT) produces the revolutionary preventive maintenance solution that combines unique optimization software with the Asset Strategy Library (ASL), the world’s most comprehensive library of asset strategies for industrial equipment, to rapidly optimize any Preventive Maintenance (PM) program. Preventance™ and the ASL set the standard for PM Optimization (PMO) by dynamically adjusting to changing operating conditions, plant requirements, and market economics. http://www.assetperformanceinc.com
Posted on

Asset Performance Technologies announces latest expansion of its Asset Strategy Library for Improving Reliability of Industrial Equipment

ASL-R19 sets new standard for Preventive Maintenance Optimization (PMO) in Asset Performance Management (APM) programs in asset-intensive industries.

Asset Performance Technologies, Inc. (APT) announced today that it has released the 19th version of its Asset Strategy Library (ASL). Here are the relevant details:

What is the ASL? The ASL is the most comprehensive library of how equipment fails (FMEA tables) and how to prevent such failures (PM Templates) for over 700 equipment types commonly found in asset-intensive industries, including:

  • 50,000 Degradation Mechanisms (FMEA rows) (70 per type)
  • 4,400 PM Tasks and Intervals (PM Templates) (6 per type)
  • 150,000 As Found Reportable Conditions (220 per type)
  • (700 types) * (2 experts/type) * (20 years/expert) ~ 28,000+man-years of experience!

Why do I need the ASL? The ASL is a database of expert wisdom to:

  • expedite RCM analyses of your maintenance strategies
  • shorten time-to-value of your CMMS and other software implementations,
  • improve profitability of your business by doing the right maintenance at the right times for YOUR plant(s).

“700 equipment types times 8 operating contexts equals 5600 RCM analyses, already done for you by equipment experts – at your fingertips!” – Mark S Benak, CEO

How can I access the ASL? The ASL is the technical basis for APT’s maintenance optimization tools at Preventance.com. It is also available in the Meridium and Bentley APM products.

Contact APT today for further information and a 30-day free trial.

About Asset Performance Technologies
Asset Performance Technologies, Inc. (APT) produces the revolutionary Preventance maintenance solution that combines unique optimization software with the Asset Strategy Library (ASL), the world’s most comprehensive library of asset strategies for industrial equipment, to rapidly optimize any PM program. Preventance and the ASL set the standard for PM Optimization (PMO) by dynamically adjusting to changing operating conditions, plant requirements, and market economics.

Posted on

Uptime Magazine Announces 2016 Uptime Award Winners

Asset Condition ManagementAsset ManagementLeadership for ReliabilityReliability Engineering for MaintenanceWork Execution Management

Prestigious Award Recipients to be Celebrated in December 14 Ceremony at the 31st International Maintenance Conference

Fort Myers, FL, August 16, 2016 – Uptime® Magazine, the leading voice in reliability and asset performance announces the winners of the Tenth Annual Uptime Awards™, honoring the best asset management, reliability and maintenance programs from across the globe.

World-class organizations use reliability and asset performance to enhance safety, achieve environmental sustainability, lower operating cost and generate positive economic results.

This year, the Uptime Awards received over 70 entries from organizations around the world. The Jury-selected winners are awarded in each of 5 primary categories and several Special Recognition Award categories.

Winners of the Uptime Awards include:

  • CBRE
  • BMS Syracuse
  • Loop LLC
  • Jacobs
  • Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources
  • APS Palo Verde Nuclear
  • Rio Tinto: Iron Ore Canada
  • Kansas City Board of Public Utilities

The full list of jury-selected winners can be found at uptimeawards.com.

Over 1,200 leaders from the world of asset management, reliability and maintenance will gather for the Uptime Awards ceremony at IMC-2016 The 31st International Maintenance Conference from December 12-16, 2026 at the Hyatt Regency Coconut Point in Bonita Springs, Florida.

“The Uptime Awards presentation is more than just a ceremony. It represents a moment for us to stand up these champions, recognizing the transformational role that reliability and asset performance has on people, profit and planet,” says Uptime Magazine CEO and Publisher, Terrence O’Hanlon. “This year we are seeing the expanded importance that reliability leadership and reliability culture plays in creating clean, safe and mission driven organizations.”

In collaboration with its partners, The Association of Asset Management Professionals, La Red Confiabilidad, Women In Reliability And Asset Management, and with support from IMC-2016 sponsors including Accenture, ARMS Reliability, Bentley Systems, Ludeca and Prüftechnik, Uptime Magazine and the Awards acknowledge a very special group of people and organizations.

Uptime Award winners will be featured in the February/March issue of Uptime Magazine.

Nominations for the 2017 Uptime Awards may be submitted beginning April 2017. Visit www.uptimeawards.com for further information.

About Uptime Magazine:
Uptime Magazine is part of the Reliabilityweb.com® network, the world’s largest body of knowledge on asset management, reliability and maintenance. With more than 20 years of published archives Reliabilityweb.com is the first place one think’s of when one thinks of asset management and reliability. Uptime Magazine continues to set the pace through innovation and thought leadership. We are changing the way 25,000 asset managers and reliability leaders get inspired, discover new ideas and find products and services that change the world. www.uptimemagazine.com

Posted on

Asset Performance Technologies announces latest expansion of its Asset Strategy Library for improving Preventative Maintenance

ASL-R17 sets new standard for Preventive Maintenance Optimization (PMO) and Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) in Asset Performance Management (APM).

Asset Performance Technologies, Inc. (APT) announced today that it has released the 17th version of its Asset Strategy Library (Release 17). APT already provides the most comprehensive library of FMEA tables and asset strategies for equipment in asset-intensive industries, and with this expansion covers even more of the needs of the maintenance & reliability professional. This addition to the library shows APT’s continued dedication to ensuring that its clients have the ability to better manage the preventative maintenance of over 650 types of equipment commonly found in most plants.

In short, the ASL is a database of expert wisdom to:

  • expedite RCM analyses of your maintenance strategies
  • shorten time-to-value of your CMMS and other software implementations,
  • improve profitability of your business by doing the right maintenance at the right times for YOUR plant(s).

ASL-R17 conains 650 equipment types (58 new and 9 updates), including:

  •     46,000 Degradation Mechanisms (FMEA rows), ~70 per type
  •     4,100 PM Tasks and Intervals (PM Templates), ~6 per type.

“It’s not just data. It’s something much more valuable. It’s the wisdom from equipment experts on how equipment fails and how to best avoid those failures.” – Mark S Benak, CEO

ASL-R17 was generated by industry subject matter experts (SMEs), who represent over 26,000 man-years of experience across multiple plants and industries. The ASL degradation mechanisms (FMEA) and PM templates (asset strategies) are valid for the complete range of known operating conditions. With PM task effectiveness mapped to each degradation mechanism, the ASL sets a new standard for PMO and APM in asset-intensive industries. The ASL is also available in the Meridium and Bentley Assetwise APM products.

Contact [APT today for a 30-day no-risk trial.

About Asset Performance Technologies
Asset Performance Technologies, Inc. (APT) produces the revolutionary Preventance maintenance solution that combines unique optimization software with the Asset Strategy Library (ASL), the world’s most comprehensive library of asset strategies for industrial equipment, to rapidly optimize any PM program. Preventance and the ASL set the standard for PM Optimization (PMO) by dynamically adjusting to changing operating conditions, plant requirements, and market economics.

Posted on

ASL-R16 Sets New Standard for Preventive Maintenance Optimization (PMO) in your Asset Performance Management (APM) Program

Asset Performance Technologies announces Release 16 of the Asset Strategy Library (ASL-R16), now the most comprehensive library of FMEA and mitigation strategies for equipment in asset-intensive industries. The ASL provides expert knowledge and wisdom to: shorten time-to-value of your CMMS and other software implementations as well as improve bottom line profitability of your business by doing the right maintenance at the right times for your plant(s).

Asset Performance Technologies, Inc. (APT) announced today that it has released Asset Strategy Library Release 16.

ASL-R16 includes 583 equipment types (36 new and 3 updates), including:

  •     44,000 Degradation Mechanisms (FMEA rows)
  •     3,900 PM Tasks and Intervals (PM Templates)

“583 equipment types * 8 known operating conditions = 4,664 RCM analyses by equipment experts. Why start from scratch when optimizing your maintenance strategies?” – Mark S Benak, CEO

ASL-R16 was generated by industry subject matter experts (SMEs), who represent over 23,000 man-years of experience across multiple plants and industries. The ASL degradation mechanisms (FMEA) and PM templates (asset strategies) are valid for the complete range of known operating conditions. With PM task effectiveness mapped to each degradation mechanism, the ASL sets a new standard for PMO and APM in asset-intensive industries. The ASL is also available in the Meridium and Bentley Assetwise APM products.

Contact APT today for a 30-day no-risk trial.

About Asset Performance Technologies
Asset Performance Technologies, Inc. (APT) produces the revolutionary Preventance maintenance solution that combines unique optimization software with the APT Asset Strategy Library (ASL), the world’s most comprehensive library of asset strategies for industrial equipment, to rapidly optimize any PM program. Preventance and the ASL set the standard for PM Optimization (PMO) by dynamically adjusting to changing operating conditions, plant requirements, and market economics.

Posted on

ASL-R15 Sets New Standards for Asset Performance Management and Preventive Maintenance Optimization.

Asset Performance Technologies announces Release 15 of the Asset Strategy Library (ASL-R15), now the most comprehensive library of FMEA and mitigation strategies for equipment in asset-intensive industries. The ASL provides expert wisdom and knowledge to: • shorten time-to-value of your CMMS and other software implementations, • improve bottom line profitability of your business by doing the right maintenance at the right times for your plant(s).

Asset Performance Technologies, Inc. (APT) announced today that it has released Asset Strategy Library Release 15.

ASL-R15 includes 31 new equipment types:

  •     43,100 Degradation Mechanisms (FMEA)
  •     3,800 PM Tasks and Intervals (PM Templates)
  •     132,000 As-Found Reportable Conditions (Failure Codes)

“544 equipment types * 8 known operating conditions = 4,352 RCM analyses by equipment experts. Why start from scratch when optimizing your maintenance strategies?” – Mark S Benak, CEO

ASL-R15 was generated by industry subject matter experts (SMEs), who represent over 22,000 man-years of experience across multiple plants and industries. The ASL degradation mechanisms (FMEA) and PM templates (strategies) are valid for the complete range of known operating conditions. With PM task effectiveness mapped to each degradation mechanism, the ASL sets a new standard for APM and PMO in asset-intensive industries. The ASL is also available in the Meridium APM and Bentley Assetwise APM products.

Contact APT today for a 30-day no-risk trial.

About Asset Performance Technologies
Asset Performance Technologies, Inc. (APT) produces the revolutionary Preventance maintenance solution that combines unique optimization software with the APT Asset Strategy Library (ASL), the world’s most comprehensive library of asset strategies for industrial equipment, to rapidly optimize any PM program. Preventance and the ASL set the standard for PM Optimization (PMO) by dynamically adjusting to changing operating conditions, plant requirements, and market economics.

Posted on